Skip to main content

Making money from MOOCs

An interesting, and brief story here on the subject of Coursera's new course format. Note in particular the first comment:
  • "So much for the democratization of information, guess Coursera's investors have finally demanded their money back. Oh well least we still have edX."
And, further news as the democratisation of online education starts to unravel in at least one online service (Udemy).

As I've mentioned before, "my own view is that if MOOCs do actually survive the next few years it will be because they have morphed to become what we already know about effective distance education, done online". MOOCs were the wrong starting point for online education, and if indeed "investors [are] finally demanded their money back" from the privately-funded Coursera this may well be the beginning of the unravelling. It's not easy to depart from free, particularly with a vast alternative supply available.

I'm not optimistic about the University of Leeds's recent initiative either, though the tie-in with a named university would be more attractive. Mention of "extend[ing] the learning opportunities for our campus-based students" may well limit the MOOC aspect to a very small number of learners prepared to pay, which again does very little to solve the high up-front cost of effective MOOC development. And, eventually the independence of MOOC learning must give way to the added hassle of on-campus attendance.

Keeping a watching brief...

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 2, 2021 at 9:29 PM

    Learn video editing course online. Students also learn how to work on tools like Adobe Premiere Pro, Adobe After Effects, Final Cut Pro, and Adobe Photoshop. This online photo editing course is for someone who wants to edit videos professionally. It is a professional course, and its objective is to make a student job-ready for a profile of a Video editor and motion graphic designer/ artist.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A further update to "Reading and studying from the screen"

Image
Elevator tale: Like the previous post " An update to "Reading and studying from the screen " updating my 2016 paper " Reading and studying on the screen ", this post surveys various articles not previously considered. This time ten articles released subsequent to mine and a further thirteen not included are considered. The additional articles help to portray a much richer series of nuances to what it means to read on-screen and how comparison studies between on-screen and print reading might be furthered.  Image: Hobbies on a Budget, https://www.flickr.com/photos/62030038@N02/ Earlier this year I posted an update to my 2016 article in the Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning " Reading and studying on the screen: An overview of literature towards good learning design practice ". The article considered much, but not all, of the scholarship at the time related to how on-screen education might be advanced in the face of student preferenc...
Read more

An update to "Reading and studying from the screen"

Image
Elevator tale: this post provides an overview of literature that has emerged since my 2016 paper " Reading and studying on the screen ". It's a much longer post than usual, but most is supplemental. A review of additional studies comparing reading text from print and digital devices, four not considered and a further seven of which were published subsequent to or alongside my own, confirm my 2016 findings and recommendations. It is clear that future studies need to explore further dimensions if we are to learn more. In particular, studies should move beyond a simple, print-based comparison (applying digital design intentionally), and should also seek to measure differences that might come from briefing participants as to how to read effectively from digital media (removing the over-confident approach readers tend to apply when reading from digital sources). One perceived barrier to digital education is that it requires students to read from a screen. In actuality ...
Read more

ePortfolios: Why I switched

Image
Well, this IS awkward. After almost ten years using my ePortfolio based on Mahara , I've made the switch to LinkedIn . The awkward part is, I proposed and chaired the development of Mahara in 2006-2007. So, why the big switcheroo? Here's how I've been operating up to now. I realised early on in my e-learning career that my best means of maintaining an online presence would be to ensure I have some sort of central profile that I could easily keep up to date and link others to. A customised tinyurl ( http://tinyurl.com/mnichols ) made this very simple, and I would use that URL for a whole host of profiles I would normally have to maintain separately. Think about it: my public blog profile , Student Hub Live profile , EDENprofile and user account profiles for the likes of Faithlife.com , Mendeley and ResearchGate … all are potential online sources for someone seeking information about me, and, without some sort of central coordination, each of them becomes rather dated ra...
Read more